Update for Agenda and link to meeting documents:
For a preview of the meeting agenda and meeting reports, please click on the following links:
Reports:
____________________________________
It is fair to say that in recent times I have been rather critical of the Council’s approach to covering the work that Scrutiny committees do. I have reflected somewhat on this and perhaps some of my criticism should be reflected on myself too – I am more than happy to blog about Pelsall issues, so why wouldn’t I try to provide more coverage of the work of the Scrutiny committee which I chair?
It strikes me that if we are to increase awareness of the role of Scrutiny in Walsall then a good place to start might be to give some idea of what it is all about; I guess that readers of this blog (if any!) will tend to be individuals that are more active in social media networks so here is a Podnosh blogger’s initial take on Scrutiny. For those even more interested I’d like to suggest the Centre for Public Scrutiny introduction to Scrutiny and it’s Health and Social Care scrutiny page.
Whether we agree with our governance structures, whether we believe them to be more or less democratic, or more or less effective – these are all considerations worthy of debate. But ‘we are where we are’ and we should not, in my view, allow our personal beliefs on these matters to undersell, and implicitly undervalue, a lot of good work that Scrutiny does through administration and opposition ‘backbench’ Councillors and support officers. We should do the best we can with the tools we have.
The Local Government Improvement & Development agency states that:
“The Local Government Act (2000) established that elected members should hold the cabinet and executive of councils to account. In addition, they are to scrutinise the work of other agencies providing local services. Health overview and scrutiny committees have specific powers in holding the NHS to account…
“Within local government, there is currently a clear distinction between the executive’s role and the role of non-executive members. Scrutiny powers extend to considering matters that are not the responsibility of the council. They can include any matters that affect the local area or its inhabitants.
“Council overview and scrutiny committees can now require executive members and officers to answer questions. They are also able to invite people, including users of services, to attend meetings to give their views or submit evidence…”
I often hear comments from cabinet (the executive) and in full Council that “this report has been through Scrutiny”, as if to imply that it has passed a hurdle that somehow gives the report more credibility. Well, yes, it would be fair to assume that, but these things don’t just ‘happen’: reports need to be studied and issues challenged; often cabinet reports are actually formulated in parallel consultation with the Scrutiny committee (the ‘Overview’ function). This has the benefit of involving a wider membership in the decision making process and reducing the potential for reports being ‘called in’.
As stated, this doesn’t just happen, it involves a lot of work, work that the vast majority of Walsall people will have no idea about. And they won’t know about it unless we tell them… That’s our responsibility.
I am pleased to say that (for the first time) I have been asked about a press release to cover the next Health Scrutiny meeting and I set this out here:
Busy agenda for Walsall’s Health Scrutiny panel
Cancer cases in Alumwell, mortality rates at Walsall Manor Hospital and quality in the borough’s care homes will all be coming under the spotlight next week.
Walsall Council’s Health Scrutiny and Performance Panel will also look at the Liverpool Care Pathway which is recognised as best practice nationally for people who are nearing the end of their lives.
Members will consider how Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust will consult on its proposed transfer to a foundation trust and the outcome of Dudley and Walsall Mental Health NHS Trust’s consultation on its proposed transfer to a foundation trust.
Councillor Marco Longhi, panel chairman, said: “We’ve got a busy agenda that has been shaped by local people.
“At the panel’s last meeting we heard from patients and service users from the Manor Hospital and they had particular concerns over trust status, the Liverpool Care Pathway and cancer rates in Alumwell.
“These issues will be discussed and examined in detail at next week’s meeting and we welcome attendance from members of the public.”
The meeting will be held at Walsall Council House in Lichfield Street on Tuesday 24 January at 6pm.
So, three cheers for the communications team and for whoever decided we should do things differently.
Maybe we shall have fewer ill-informed ‘letters to the editor’ asking “what is the Scrutiny committee doing about this…”.
Having said that, said letters would have more credence and legitimacy if their writers actually came to committee meetings…















Marco Longhi was elected in May 1999 and represents Pelsall ward in Walsall.